Best Known (67, 104, s)-Nets in Base 4
(67, 104, 135)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (67, 104, 135)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 18, 5)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- the rational function field F4(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (49, 86, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 18, 5)-net over F4, using
(67, 104, 252)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (67, 104, 252)-net over F4, using
(67, 104, 7002)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (67, 104, 7003)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (67, 103, 7003)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 103 065242 861393 028673 644961 591852 324948 455163 932061 611239 108575 > 4103 [i]