Best Known (121, 162, s)-Nets in Base 4
(121, 162, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (121, 162, 531)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (121, 171, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 177)-net over F64, using
(121, 162, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(121, 162, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 54, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 56, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 56, 216)-net in base 64, using
(121, 162, 1462)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (121, 162, 1462)-net over F4, using
(121, 162, 194415)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (121, 162, 194416)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (121, 161, 194416)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 8 544030 106965 903014 836481 219279 301127 632544 143818 732410 457050 710240 628116 482918 776658 922978 156934 > 4161 [i]