MinT - Best Known (39, 166, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (39, 166, s)-Nets in Base 4

(39, 166, 56)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (39, 166, 56)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 166, 56)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
    - F₅ from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(39, 166, 66)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (39, 166, 66)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 166, 66)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 65)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

(39, 166, 165)-Net over F₄ — Upper bound on s (digital)

There is no digital (39, 166, 166)-net over F₄, because

7 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (39, 159, 166)-net over F₄, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4¹⁵⁹, 166, F₄, 120) (dual of [166, 7, 121]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(4³⁹, 45, F₄, 30) (dual of [45, 6, 31]-code), but
    - â€œDaâ€ bound on codes from Brouwerâ€™s database [i]

(39, 166, 256)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (39, 166, 257)-net in base 4, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 165, 257)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4^mÂ â‰¥ 2250 496387 183131 135261 642523 277832 322930 091503 831621 557664 993655 090334 729626 712914 190334 978233 199360 > 4¹⁶⁵ [i]