Best Known (134, 167, s)-Nets in Base 4
(134, 167, 1076)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 167, 1076)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (133, 166, 1076)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (18, 34, 48)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 17, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 17, 24)-net over F16, using
- digital (99, 132, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (18, 34, 48)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(134, 167, 5928)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (134, 167, 5928)-net over F4, using
(134, 167, 3997500)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 167, 3997501)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (134, 166, 3997501)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 8749 033639 067039 724121 771089 742709 999785 945720 351003 414779 574403 462393 605086 903886 791192 568251 477421 > 4166 [i]