Best Known (41, 169, s)-Nets in Base 4
(41, 169, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 169, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 169, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(41, 169, 75)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (41, 169, 75)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 169, 75)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 74)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 75, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 74)-sequence over F4, using
(41, 169, 172)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (41, 169, 173)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4169, 173, F4, 128) (dual of [173, 4, 129]-code), but
(41, 169, 270)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 169, 271)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 673830 935742 327598 578811 736750 714230 333901 862515 481330 638388 080207 031747 664825 180179 754677 769250 266876 > 4169 [i]