Best Known (19, 182, s)-Nets in Base 4
(19, 182, 33)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 182, 33)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 182, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
(19, 182, 41)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (19, 182, 41)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (18, 182, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(19, 182, 71)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 182, 72)-net in base 4, because
- 42 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 140, 72)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4140, 72, S4, 2, 121), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 124 330809 102446 660538 845562 036705 210025 114037 699336 929360 115994 223289 874253 133343 883264 / 61 > 4140 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4140, 72, S4, 2, 121), but