Best Known (147, 198, s)-Nets in Base 4
(147, 198, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (147, 198, 531)-net over F4, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (147, 210, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
(147, 198, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(147, 198, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 66, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
(147, 198, 1598)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (147, 198, 1598)-net over F4, using
(147, 198, 188230)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (147, 198, 188231)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (147, 197, 188231)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 40349 407534 583549 023463 272805 203245 916358 128563 341810 146310 987293 664106 838748 766562 045581 154778 648283 353912 625619 390096 > 4197 [i]