Best Known (155, 212, s)-Nets in Base 4
(155, 212, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 212, 531)-net over F4, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (155, 222, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
(155, 212, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(155, 212, 576)-net in base 4, using
- 42 times duplication [i] based on (153, 210, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
(155, 212, 1404)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (155, 212, 1404)-net over F4, using
(155, 212, 129646)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 212, 129647)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (155, 211, 129647)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 10 832902 607857 554068 690275 188644 437068 634303 893283 224757 858843 366854 453230 039686 050113 968135 177060 732984 721424 172607 107702 401322 > 4211 [i]