Best Known (166, 213, s)-Nets in Base 4
(166, 213, 1052)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 213, 1052)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (165, 212, 1052)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 263)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 262)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 263)-net over F256, using
(166, 213, 3996)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (166, 213, 3996)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4213, 3996, F4, 47) (dual of [3996, 3783, 48]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4213, 4110, F4, 47) (dual of [4110, 3897, 48]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4212, 4109, F4, 47) (dual of [4109, 3897, 48]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(46) ⊂ Ce(44) [i] based on
- linear OA(4211, 4096, F4, 47) (dual of [4096, 3885, 48]-code), using an extension Ce(46) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,46], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(4199, 4096, F4, 45) (dual of [4096, 3897, 46]-code), using an extension Ce(44) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
- linear OA(41, 13, F4, 1) (dual of [13, 12, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(46) ⊂ Ce(44) [i] based on
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4212, 4109, F4, 47) (dual of [4109, 3897, 48]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4213, 4110, F4, 47) (dual of [4110, 3897, 48]-code), using
(166, 213, 1113653)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 213, 1113654)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (166, 212, 1113654)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 43 322980 337272 778471 764776 268759 696792 344646 701415 894919 401883 001921 100754 504937 135370 524834 163746 757337 202986 387312 234901 348352 > 4212 [i]