Best Known (22, 219, s)-Nets in Base 4
(22, 219, 34)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 219, 34)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 219, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
(22, 219, 44)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (22, 219, 44)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 219, 44)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 43)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 44, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 43)-sequence over F4, using
(22, 219, 81)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 219, 82)-net in base 4, because
- 59 times m-reduction [i] would yield (22, 160, 82)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4160, 82, S4, 2, 138), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 341 757925 747345 613183 203472 987128 338336 432723 577064 443191 526657 251555 156124 902488 003673 933909 852160 / 139 > 4160 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4160, 82, S4, 2, 138), but