Best Known (145, 222, s)-Nets in Base 4
(145, 222, 163)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 222, 163)-net over F4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 224, 163)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 54, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (91, 170, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 85, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 85, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (15, 54, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(145, 222, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(145, 222, 240)-net in base 4, using
- 42 times duplication [i] based on (143, 220, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (33, 110, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 88, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 88, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (33, 110, 120)-net in base 16, using
(145, 222, 523)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (145, 222, 523)-net over F4, using
(145, 222, 15859)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 222, 15860)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 221, 15860)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11 375817 719196 299957 152441 300714 087645 935226 558624 612878 520556 208517 064832 203094 358857 567328 530636 897111 241735 810718 097444 579280 739740 > 4221 [i]