Best Known (165, 225, s)-Nets in Base 4
(165, 225, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 225, 531)-net over F4, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 237, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
(165, 225, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(165, 225, 576)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (164, 225, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (14, 75, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (14, 75, 192)-net in base 64, using
(165, 225, 1533)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (165, 225, 1533)-net over F4, using
(165, 225, 131533)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 225, 131534)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2907 667795 185245 679968 329885 491602 736988 500067 280508 236596 602453 892942 574775 795610 887523 731276 053392 760362 391756 621670 810548 964527 920384 > 4225 [i]