Best Known (133, 232, s)-Nets in Base 4
(133, 232, 131)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 232, 131)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (133, 233, 131)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 60, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 173, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (10, 60, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(133, 232, 271)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (133, 232, 271)-net over F4, using
(133, 232, 4349)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 232, 4350)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (133, 231, 4350)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11 926960 719767 026489 601110 331077 757622 374426 260423 208752 678247 363624 179523 574089 534383 611620 871276 985780 985522 008619 518759 467250 542109 469563 > 4231 [i]