Best Known (192, 232, s)-Nets in Base 4
(192, 232, 1560)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (192, 232, 1560)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (191, 231, 1560)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 27, 21)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 20)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 20)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (164, 204, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (7, 27, 21)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(192, 232, 19598)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (192, 232, 19598)-net over F4, using
(192, 232, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (192, 232, large)-net in base 4, because
- 38 times m-reduction [i] would yield (192, 194, large)-net in base 4, but