Best Known (35, 235, s)-Nets in Base 4
(35, 235, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 235, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 235, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(35, 235, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (35, 235, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 235, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(35, 235, 144)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 235, 145)-net in base 4, because
- 104 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 131, 145)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4131, 145, S4, 96), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 4 521509 394595 294317 880132 762660 256020 199722 572909 200327 946519 584732 236773 399422 238875 189248 / 570286 240909 > 4131 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4131, 145, S4, 96), but