Best Known (51, 241, s)-Nets in Base 4
(51, 241, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 241, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 241, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(51, 241, 91)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (51, 241, 91)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 241, 91)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 91, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
(51, 241, 214)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (51, 241, 215)-net over F4, because
- 34 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (51, 207, 215)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4207, 215, F4, 156) (dual of [215, 8, 157]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(4206, 211, F4, 156) (dual of [211, 5, 157]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(450, 54, F4, 39) (dual of [54, 4, 40]-code), but
- 3 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(447, 51, F4, 36) (dual of [51, 4, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(450, 54, F4, 39) (dual of [54, 4, 40]-code), but
- OA(48, 215, S4, 4), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(48, 121, S4, 4), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 65704 > 48 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(48, 121, S4, 4), but
- linear OA(4206, 211, F4, 156) (dual of [211, 5, 157]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4207, 215, F4, 156) (dual of [215, 8, 157]-code), but
(51, 241, 218)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 241, 219)-net in base 4, because
- 26 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 215, 219)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4215, 219, S4, 164), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 177450 860423 732151 013018 507785 157357 019931 972824 052260 810910 693159 335763 699560 039874 558361 990664 932998 233037 501529 828597 054346 100736 / 55 > 4215 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4215, 219, S4, 164), but