Best Known (144, 253, s)-Nets in Base 4
(144, 253, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 253, 137)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 256, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 185, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(144, 253, 283)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (144, 253, 283)-net over F4, using
(144, 253, 4464)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 253, 4465)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 252, 4465)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 52 880302 800087 079018 859010 716699 636308 174417 787645 972874 075490 834983 808659 171482 385339 944545 461221 113143 949509 811029 473459 775843 702872 277803 702523 301600 > 4252 [i]