Best Known (50, 258, s)-Nets in Base 4
(50, 258, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 258, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 258, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(50, 258, 91)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (50, 258, 91)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 91, using
(50, 258, 209)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (50, 258, 210)-net over F4, because
- 56 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (50, 202, 210)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4202, 210, F4, 152) (dual of [210, 8, 153]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(4201, 206, F4, 152) (dual of [206, 5, 153]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(449, 53, F4, 38) (dual of [53, 4, 39]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(447, 51, F4, 36) (dual of [51, 4, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(449, 53, F4, 38) (dual of [53, 4, 39]-code), but
- OA(48, 210, S4, 4), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(48, 121, S4, 4), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 65704 > 48 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(48, 121, S4, 4), but
- linear OA(4201, 206, F4, 152) (dual of [206, 5, 153]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4202, 210, F4, 152) (dual of [210, 8, 153]-code), but
(50, 258, 214)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 258, 215)-net in base 4, because
- 47 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 211, 215)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4211, 215, S4, 161), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 346 583711 765101 857447 301773 017885 462929 554634 421977 071896 309947 576827 663475 703202 879996 800763 017447 262173 901370 175446 478621 769728 / 27 > 4211 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4211, 215, S4, 161), but