Best Known (58, 259, s)-Nets in Base 4
(58, 259, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 259, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 259, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(58, 259, 91)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (58, 259, 91)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 259, 91)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 91, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
(58, 259, 240)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (58, 259, 241)-net over F4, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (58, 234, 241)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4234, 241, F4, 176) (dual of [241, 7, 177]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(458, 64, F4, 44) (dual of [64, 6, 45]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(414, 19, F4, 11) (dual of [19, 5, 12]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- “Liz†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(414, 19, F4, 11) (dual of [19, 5, 12]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(458, 64, F4, 44) (dual of [64, 6, 45]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4234, 241, F4, 176) (dual of [241, 7, 177]-code), but
(58, 259, 246)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 259, 247)-net in base 4, because
- 16 times m-reduction [i] would yield (58, 243, 247)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4243, 247, S4, 185), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 6393 341031 047152 089869 511126 616404 594173 128996 177860 916959 553453 312761 321102 879990 006386 899074 031556 935325 554936 640763 689877 454191 182408 307282 280448 / 31 > 4243 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4243, 247, S4, 185), but