Best Known (23, 72, s)-Nets in Base 4
(23, 72, 34)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 72, 34)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 72, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
(23, 72, 45)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (23, 72, 45)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 44)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
(23, 72, 174)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 72, 175)-net in base 4, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 69, 175)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(469, 175, S4, 46), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 672974 508783 713085 919446 392721 434812 374063 221813 152066 788676 290147 045574 983959 198536 005103 820640 027801 847804 723200 000000 / 1 829712 211075 097010 907956 226624 270704 376891 436886 295247 592787 694007 310519 329949 > 469 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(469, 175, S4, 46), but