Best Known (27, 88, s)-Nets in Base 4
(27, 88, 34)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 88, 34)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 88, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
(27, 88, 42)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(27, 88, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
(27, 88, 55)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (27, 88, 55)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 88, 55)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 54)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 54)-sequence over F4, using
(27, 88, 200)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 88, 201)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 87, 201)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 26791 312051 633117 700859 127237 005503 671727 589936 505312 > 487 [i]