Best Known (18−11, 18, s)-Nets in Base 49
(18−11, 18, 102)-Net over F49 — Constructive and digital
Digital (7, 18, 102)-net over F49, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 6, 51)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 50)-sequence over F49, using
- digital (1, 12, 51)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 50)-sequence over F49 (see above)
- digital (1, 6, 51)-net over F49, using
(18−11, 18, 128)-Net over F49 — Digital
Digital (7, 18, 128)-net over F49, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4918, 128, F49, 11) (dual of [128, 110, 12]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OA(496, 64, F49, 5) (dual of [64, 58, 6]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,58P) [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- linear OA(4912, 64, F49, 11) (dual of [64, 52, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,52P) [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 64 (see above)
- linear OA(496, 64, F49, 5) (dual of [64, 58, 6]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(18−11, 18, 30285)-Net in Base 49 — Upper bound on s
There is no (7, 18, 30286)-net in base 49, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (7, 17, 30286)-net in base 49, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 49m ≥ 54123 439665 381389 504793 678625 > 4917 [i]