Best Known (46−29, 46, s)-Nets in Base 49
(46−29, 46, 103)-Net over F49 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 46, 103)-net over F49, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 15, 51)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 50)-sequence over F49, using
- digital (2, 31, 52)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 51)-sequence over F49, using
- digital (1, 15, 51)-net over F49, using
(46−29, 46, 142)-Net over F49 — Digital
Digital (17, 46, 142)-net over F49, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4946, 142, F49, 2, 29) (dual of [(142, 2), 238, 30]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(4915, 64, F49, 2, 14) (dual of [(64, 2), 113, 15]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,113P) [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- linear OOA(4931, 78, F49, 2, 29) (dual of [(78, 2), 125, 30]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,126P) [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- linear OOA(4915, 64, F49, 2, 14) (dual of [(64, 2), 113, 15]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(46−29, 46, 34111)-Net in Base 49 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 46, 34112)-net in base 49, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 45, 34112)-net in base 49, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 49m ≥ 11451 962228 541212 681986 862264 768619 630596 395610 396480 448232 998463 787591 510017 > 4945 [i]