Best Known (29−3, 29, s)-Nets in Base 49
(29−3, 29, large)-Net over F49 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 29, large)-net over F49, using
- 492 times duplication [i] based on digital (24, 27, large)-net over F49, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 27, large)-net over F49, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 5, 5884901)-net over F49, using
- digital (17, 22, 5764804)-net over F49, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 5, 5884901)-net over F49 (see above)
- digital (12, 17, 2882402)-net over F49, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4917, 2882402, F49, 5, 5) (dual of [(2882402, 5), 14411993, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(4917, 5764805, F49, 5) (dual of [5764805, 5764788, 6]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(4) ⊂ Ce(3) [i] based on
- linear OA(4917, 5764801, F49, 5) (dual of [5764801, 5764784, 6]-code), using an extension Ce(4) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 5764800 = 494−1, defining interval I = [1,4], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- linear OA(4913, 5764801, F49, 4) (dual of [5764801, 5764788, 5]-code), using an extension Ce(3) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 5764800 = 494−1, defining interval I = [1,3], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 4 [i]
- linear OA(490, 4, F49, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(490, s, F49, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(4) ⊂ Ce(3) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(4917, 5764805, F49, 5) (dual of [5764805, 5764788, 6]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4917, 2882402, F49, 5, 5) (dual of [(2882402, 5), 14411993, 6]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 27, large)-net over F49, using
(29−3, 29, large)-Net in Base 49 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 29, large)-net in base 49, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 28, large)-net in base 49, but