Best Known (17, 17+31, s)-Nets in Base 49
(17, 17+31, 102)-Net over F49 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 48, 102)-net over F49, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 16, 51)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 50)-sequence over F49, using
- digital (1, 32, 51)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 50)-sequence over F49 (see above)
- digital (1, 16, 51)-net over F49, using
(17, 17+31, 128)-Net over F49 — Digital
Digital (17, 48, 128)-net over F49, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4948, 128, F49, 2, 31) (dual of [(128, 2), 208, 32]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(4916, 64, F49, 2, 15) (dual of [(64, 2), 112, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,112P) [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- linear OOA(4932, 64, F49, 2, 31) (dual of [(64, 2), 96, 32]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,96P) [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 64 (see above)
- linear OOA(4916, 64, F49, 2, 15) (dual of [(64, 2), 112, 16]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(17, 17+31, 26445)-Net in Base 49 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 48, 26446)-net in base 49, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 47, 26446)-net in base 49, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 49m ≥ 27 499182 155182 844262 884420 142416 388543 965937 191814 672423 813633 738354 303476 450401 > 4947 [i]