Best Known (25−10, 25, s)-Nets in Base 5
(25−10, 25, 58)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 25, 58)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 5, 6)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- the rational function field F5(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (10, 20, 52)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 10, 26)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
- the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 10, 26)-net over F25, using
- digital (0, 5, 6)-net over F5, using
(25−10, 25, 113)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (15, 25, 113)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(525, 113, F5, 10) (dual of [113, 88, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(525, 124, F5, 10) (dual of [124, 99, 11]-code), using
(25−10, 25, 2032)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 25, 2033)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 298725 322091 637749 > 525 [i]