Best Known (27−11, 27, s)-Nets in Base 5
(27−11, 27, 60)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 27, 60)-net over F5, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 4, 20)-net over F5, using
- s-reduction based on digital (1, 4, 26)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(54, 26, F5, 3, 3) (dual of [(26, 3), 74, 4]-NRT-code), using
- s-reduction based on digital (1, 4, 26)-net over F5, using
- digital (2, 7, 20)-net over F5, using
- s-reduction based on digital (2, 7, 21)-net over F5, using
- digital (5, 16, 20)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 19)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 19)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (1, 4, 20)-net over F5, using
(27−11, 27, 103)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (16, 27, 103)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(527, 103, F5, 11) (dual of [103, 76, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(527, 124, F5, 11) (dual of [124, 97, 12]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 124 = 53−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(527, 124, F5, 11) (dual of [124, 97, 12]-code), using
(27−11, 27, 2804)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 27, 2805)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 26, 2805)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1 490377 937739 016965 > 526 [i]