Best Known (20, 20+124, s)-Nets in Base 5
(20, 20+124, 43)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 144, 43)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (18, 144, 43)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 42)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F5 with g(F) = 17, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 42)-sequence over F5, using
(20, 20+124, 45)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (20, 144, 45)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 144, 45)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 44)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 44)-sequence over F5, using
(20, 20+124, 106)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 144, 107)-net in base 5, because
- 49 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 95, 107)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(595, 107, S5, 75), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 3749 470082 011763 089334 443281 903258 039788 884303 789018 304087 221622 467041 015625 / 1344 020328 > 595 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(595, 107, S5, 75), but