Best Known (26, 26+19, s)-Nets in Base 5
(26, 26+19, 104)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 45, 104)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 46, 104)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 52)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 52)-net over F25, using
(26, 26+19, 112)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (26, 45, 112)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 46, 112)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 56)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 56)-net over F25, using
(26, 26+19, 2703)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 45, 2704)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 44, 2704)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 5 699717 285484 294042 778483 484225 > 544 [i]