Best Known (59, 59+23, s)-Nets in Base 5
(59, 59+23, 272)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 82, 272)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 16, 20)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 19)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 19)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (43, 66, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 33, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 33, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (5, 16, 20)-net over F5, using
(59, 59+23, 923)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (59, 82, 923)-net over F5, using
(59, 59+23, 172145)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 82, 172146)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 81, 172146)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 413 604774 532611 482018 388280 502135 392880 875298 033334 557545 > 581 [i]