Best Known (112−25, 112, s)-Nets in Base 5
(112−25, 112, 460)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (87, 112, 460)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (30, 42, 208)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 21, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 21, 104)-net over F25, using
- digital (45, 70, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (30, 42, 208)-net over F5, using
(112−25, 112, 4491)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (87, 112, 4491)-net over F5, using
(112−25, 112, 3861650)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (87, 112, 3861651)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (87, 111, 3861651)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 385186 148166 792212 809475 209714 002542 317084 294240 861966 469254 983713 781590 777425 > 5111 [i]