Best Known (101, 101+25, s)-Nets in Base 5
(101, 101+25, 1304)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 126, 1304)-net over F5, using
- 51 times duplication [i] based on digital (100, 125, 1304)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(5125, 1304, F5, 25, 25) (dual of [(1304, 25), 32475, 26]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(5125, 15649, F5, 25) (dual of [15649, 15524, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(5125, 15652, F5, 25) (dual of [15652, 15527, 26]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,12]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- linear OA(5121, 15626, F5, 25) (dual of [15626, 15505, 26]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15626 | 512−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−12,−11,…,12}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(597, 15626, F5, 21) (dual of [15626, 15529, 22]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15626 | 512−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−10,−9,…,10}|+1 = 22 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(54, 26, F5, 3) (dual of [26, 22, 4]-code or 26-cap in PG(3,5)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,12]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(5125, 15652, F5, 25) (dual of [15652, 15527, 26]-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(5125, 15649, F5, 25) (dual of [15649, 15524, 26]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(5125, 1304, F5, 25, 25) (dual of [(1304, 25), 32475, 26]-NRT-code), using
(101, 101+25, 14814)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (101, 126, 14814)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(5126, 14814, F5, 25) (dual of [14814, 14688, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(5126, 15655, F5, 25) (dual of [15655, 15529, 26]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,12]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- linear OA(5121, 15626, F5, 25) (dual of [15626, 15505, 26]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15626 | 512−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−12,−11,…,12}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(597, 15626, F5, 21) (dual of [15626, 15529, 22]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15626 | 512−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−10,−9,…,10}|+1 = 22 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(55, 29, F5, 3) (dual of [29, 24, 4]-code or 29-cap in PG(4,5)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(55, 42, F5, 3) (dual of [42, 37, 4]-code or 42-cap in PG(4,5)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,12]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(5126, 15655, F5, 25) (dual of [15655, 15529, 26]-code), using
(101, 101+25, large)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 126, large)-net in base 5, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 103, large)-net in base 5, but