Best Known (89−26, 89, s)-Nets in Base 5
(89−26, 89, 270)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 89, 270)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 17, 18)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 17)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 18, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 17)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (46, 72, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 36, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 36, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (4, 17, 18)-net over F5, using
(89−26, 89, 796)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (63, 89, 796)-net over F5, using
(89−26, 89, 86408)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 89, 86409)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 161 573682 754575 009133 034886 942789 701763 851612 901745 845027 176885 > 589 [i]