Best Known (124−27, 124, s)-Nets in Base 5
(124−27, 124, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (97, 124, 504)-net over F5, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (97, 126, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (34, 48, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (49, 78, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 39, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 39, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (34, 48, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(124−27, 124, 5698)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (97, 124, 5698)-net over F5, using
(124−27, 124, 5816705)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (97, 124, 5816706)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (97, 123, 5816706)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 94 039654 002991 724044 478810 862256 448657 221441 652260 588009 026478 870873 249083 042236 514825 > 5123 [i]