Best Known (96, 96+28, s)-Nets in Base 5
(96, 96+28, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 124, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (34, 48, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (48, 76, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 38, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 38, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (34, 48, 252)-net over F5, using
(96, 96+28, 4444)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (96, 124, 4444)-net over F5, using
(96, 96+28, 2345703)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 124, 2345704)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 470 199718 382603 589058 943554 511658 315914 024214 665295 127892 261620 735354 831064 830733 149825 > 5124 [i]