Best Known (134−29, 134, s)-Nets in Base 5
(134−29, 134, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 134, 504)-net over F5, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (105, 138, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (36, 52, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 26, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 26, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (53, 86, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 43, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 43, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (36, 52, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(134−29, 134, 6266)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (105, 134, 6266)-net over F5, using
(134−29, 134, 6601036)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 134, 6601037)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 133, 6601037)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 918 356017 777724 405429 913426 683681 288559 829965 843680 736706 596291 530106 561886 645201 147448 766825 > 5133 [i]