Best Known (94−74, 94, s)-Nets in Base 5
(94−74, 94, 43)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 94, 43)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (18, 94, 43)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 42)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F5 with g(F) = 17, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 42)-sequence over F5, using
(94−74, 94, 45)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (20, 94, 45)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 94, 45)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 44)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 44)-sequence over F5, using
(94−74, 94, 107)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 94, 108)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 93, 108)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(593, 108, S5, 73), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 3902 739445 008963 915031 498848 309181 141924 550928 479220 601730 048656 463623 046875 / 28719 174411 > 593 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(593, 108, S5, 73), but