Best Known (80−9, 80, s)-Nets in Base 5
(80−9, 80, 2097287)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (71, 80, 2097287)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 9, 137)-net over F5, using
- digital (62, 71, 2097150)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(571, 2097150, F5, 9, 9) (dual of [(2097150, 9), 18874279, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(571, 8388601, F5, 9) (dual of [8388601, 8388530, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(571, large, F5, 9) (dual of [large, large−71, 10]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765624 = 510−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(571, large, F5, 9) (dual of [large, large−71, 10]-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(571, 8388601, F5, 9) (dual of [8388601, 8388530, 10]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(571, 2097150, F5, 9, 9) (dual of [(2097150, 9), 18874279, 10]-NRT-code), using
(80−9, 80, large)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (71, 80, large)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (71, 81, large)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(581, large, F5, 10) (dual of [large, large−81, 11]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(581, large, F5, 11) (dual of [large, large−81, 12]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765626 | 520−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−5,−4,…,5}|+1 = 12 (BCH-bound) [i]
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(581, large, F5, 11) (dual of [large, large−81, 12]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(581, large, F5, 10) (dual of [large, large−81, 11]-code), using
(80−9, 80, large)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (71, 80, large)-net in base 5, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (71, 73, large)-net in base 5, but