Best Known (24, 24+95, s)-Nets in Base 5
(24, 24+95, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 119, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 119, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(24, 24+95, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (24, 119, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 119, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(24, 24+95, 124)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 119, 125)-net in base 5, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 112, 125)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5112, 125, S5, 88), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 34583 984196 672356 314446 603914 308245 637967 395612 680232 552804 682200 076058 506965 637207 031250 / 13859 944813 > 5112 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5112, 125, S5, 88), but