Best Known (91, 116, s)-Nets in Base 5
(91, 116, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 116, 504)-net over F5, using
- 52 times duplication [i] based on digital (89, 114, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (32, 44, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 22, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 22, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (45, 70, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (32, 44, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(91, 116, 5869)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (91, 116, 5869)-net over F5, using
(91, 116, 6603336)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 116, 6603337)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 115, 6603337)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 240 741622 926948 781113 953923 572378 562850 789489 206281 283457 895502 348603 016602 941265 > 5115 [i]