Best Known (129, 133, s)-Nets in Base 5
(129, 133, large)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 133, large)-net over F5, using
- 516 times duplication [i] based on digital (113, 117, large)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (108, 117, large)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 31, 4194301)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(531, 4194301, F5, 4, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 4), 16777173, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(531, 4194301, F5, 3, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 3), 12582872, 5]-NRT-code), using
- OA 2-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(531, 8388602, F5, 4) (dual of [8388602, 8388571, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(531, large, F5, 4) (dual of [large, large−31, 5]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765624 = 510−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(531, large, F5, 4) (dual of [large, large−31, 5]-code), using
- OA 2-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(531, 8388602, F5, 4) (dual of [8388602, 8388571, 5]-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(531, 4194301, F5, 3, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 3), 12582872, 5]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(531, 4194301, F5, 4, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 4), 16777173, 5]-NRT-code), using
- digital (77, 86, 4194306)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 4, 6)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- the rational function field F5(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (73, 82, 4194300)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(582, 4194300, F5, 10, 9) (dual of [(4194300, 10), 41942918, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(582, 8388601, F5, 2, 9) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777120, 10]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(582, 8388602, F5, 2, 9) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777122, 10]-NRT-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(2541, 4194301, F25, 2, 9) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388561, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2541, 8388602, F25, 9) (dual of [8388602, 8388561, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2541, large, F25, 9) (dual of [large, large−41, 10]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765626 | 2510−1, defining interval I = [0,4], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−4,−3,…,4}|+1 = 10 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2541, large, F25, 9) (dual of [large, large−41, 10]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2541, 8388602, F25, 9) (dual of [8388602, 8388561, 10]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(2541, 4194301, F25, 2, 9) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388561, 10]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(582, 8388602, F5, 2, 9) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777122, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(582, 8388601, F5, 2, 9) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777120, 10]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(582, 4194300, F5, 10, 9) (dual of [(4194300, 10), 41942918, 10]-NRT-code), using
- digital (0, 4, 6)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 31, 4194301)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (108, 117, large)-net over F5, using
(129, 133, large)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 133, large)-net in base 5, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 131, large)-net in base 5, but