Best Known (23, 136, s)-Nets in Base 5
(23, 136, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 136, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 136, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(23, 136, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (23, 136, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
(23, 136, 120)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 136, 121)-net in base 5, because
- 31 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 105, 121)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5105, 121, S5, 82), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 93 626609 426406 933398 245190 747110 019959 125490 167373 140337 758741 225115 954875 946044 921875 / 3 706166 335599 > 5105 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5105, 121, S5, 82), but