Best Known (42, 57, s)-Nets in Base 5
(42, 57, 258)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 57, 258)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 7, 6)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- the rational function field F5(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (35, 50, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 25, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 25, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (0, 7, 6)-net over F5, using
(42, 57, 1067)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (42, 57, 1067)-net over F5, using
(42, 57, 330074)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 57, 330075)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 56, 330075)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1387 783036 137639 441759 699836 604975 879061 > 556 [i]