Best Known (46−13, 46, s)-Nets in Base 64
(46−13, 46, 43821)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 46, 43821)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 9, 130)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 3, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (0, 6, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64 (see above)
- digital (0, 3, 65)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (24, 37, 43691)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6437, 43691, F64, 13, 13) (dual of [(43691, 13), 567946, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6437, 262147, F64, 13) (dual of [262147, 262110, 14]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(11) [i] based on
- linear OA(6437, 262144, F64, 13) (dual of [262144, 262107, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 643−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(6434, 262144, F64, 12) (dual of [262144, 262110, 13]-code), using an extension Ce(11) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 643−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(640, 3, F64, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(640, s, F64, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(11) [i] based on
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6437, 262147, F64, 13) (dual of [262147, 262110, 14]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6437, 43691, F64, 13, 13) (dual of [(43691, 13), 567946, 14]-NRT-code), using
- digital (3, 9, 130)-net over F64, using
(46−13, 46, 349527)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(33, 46, 349527)-net in base 64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on OOA(6446, 349527, S64, 13, 13), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on OA(6446, 2097163, S64, 13), using
- discarding parts of the base [i] based on linear OA(12839, 2097163, F128, 13) (dual of [2097163, 2097124, 14]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- linear OA(12837, 2097152, F128, 13) (dual of [2097152, 2097115, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2097151 = 1283−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(12828, 2097152, F128, 10) (dual of [2097152, 2097124, 11]-code), using an extension Ce(9) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2097151 = 1283−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- linear OA(1282, 11, F128, 2) (dual of [11, 9, 3]-code or 11-arc in PG(1,128)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1282, 128, F128, 2) (dual of [128, 126, 3]-code or 128-arc in PG(1,128)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(126,128) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1282, 128, F128, 2) (dual of [128, 126, 3]-code or 128-arc in PG(1,128)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- discarding parts of the base [i] based on linear OA(12839, 2097163, F128, 13) (dual of [2097163, 2097124, 14]-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on OA(6446, 2097163, S64, 13), using
(46−13, 46, 704230)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (33, 46, 704230)-net over F64, using
(46−13, 46, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 46, large)-net in base 64, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 35, large)-net in base 64, but