MinT - Best Known (10, 10+22, s)-Nets in Base 64

Best Known (10, 10+22, s)-Nets in Base 64

(10, 10+22, 177)-Net over F₆₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (10, 32, 177)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 32, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
    - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(10, 10+22, 225)-Net over F₆₄ — Digital

Digital (10, 32, 225)-net over F₆₄, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F₆₄, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(10, 10+22, 259)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive

(10, 32, 259)-net in base 64, using

base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 259)-net over F₂₅₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
  - Niederreiter sequence [i]

(10, 10+22, 321)-Net in Base 64

(10, 32, 321)-net in base 64, using

base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 321)-net over F₂₅₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
    - sharp bound on the number of rational points on curves with genus 2 [i]

(10, 10+22, 13991)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s

There is no (10, 32, 13992)-net in base 64, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64^mÂ â‰¥ 6281 080558 585259 749061 111526 830403 694729 107937 666402 324900 > 64³² [i]