Best Known (8, 8+25, s)-Nets in Base 64
(8, 8+25, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 33, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 33, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(8, 8+25, 192)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(8, 33, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (8, 35, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 30, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 30, 192)-net over F128, using
(8, 8+25, 5496)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 33, 5497)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (8, 32, 5497)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 6289 982488 974287 478184 449774 810980 334979 814739 298016 243380 > 6432 [i]