Best Known (36−26, 36, s)-Nets in Base 64
(36−26, 36, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(36−26, 36, 225)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (10, 36, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
(36−26, 36, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(10, 36, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(36−26, 36, 289)-Net in Base 64
(10, 36, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(36−26, 36, 9026)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 36, 9027)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 105460 872406 501751 653497 170262 373318 815767 555009 915599 007842 778848 > 6436 [i]