MinT - Best Known (10, 10+26, s)-Nets in Base 64

Best Known (10, 10+26, s)-Nets in Base 64

(10, 10+26, 177)-Net over F₆₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (10, 36, 177)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
    - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(10, 10+26, 225)-Net over F₆₄ — Digital

Digital (10, 36, 225)-net over F₆₄, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F₆₄, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(10, 10+26, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive

(10, 36, 258)-net in base 64, using

base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F₂₅₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
  - Niederreiter sequence [i]

(10, 10+26, 289)-Net in Base 64

(10, 36, 289)-net in base 64, using

base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 289)-net over F₂₅₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
    - sharp bound on the number of rational points on curves with genus 1 [i]

(10, 10+26, 9026)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s

There is no (10, 36, 9027)-net in base 64, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64^mÂ â‰¥ 105460 872406 501751 653497 170262 373318 815767 555009 915599 007842 778848 > 64³⁶ [i]