Best Known (11, 11+29, s)-Nets in Base 64
(11, 11+29, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(11, 11+29, 225)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (11, 40, 225)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 40, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
(11, 11+29, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(11, 40, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 30, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(11, 11+29, 289)-Net in Base 64
(11, 40, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 30, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(11, 11+29, 10311)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 40, 10312)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 39, 10312)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 27613 515052 554751 078472 835260 500116 274632 477592 554061 438457 211479 936152 > 6439 [i]