Best Known (51, 51+35, s)-Nets in Base 64
(51, 51+35, 641)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 86, 641)-net over F64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 87, 641)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 23, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (28, 64, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (5, 23, 128)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(51, 51+35, 964)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(51, 86, 964)-net in base 64, using
- 642 times duplication [i] based on (49, 84, 964)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (37, 72, 964)-net over F128, using
- 1282 times duplication [i] based on digital (35, 70, 964)-net over F128, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(12870, 964, F128, 35, 35) (dual of [(964, 35), 33670, 36]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 17-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(12870, 16389, F128, 35) (dual of [16389, 16319, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(12870, 16390, F128, 35) (dual of [16390, 16320, 36]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,17]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- linear OA(12869, 16385, F128, 35) (dual of [16385, 16316, 36]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 1284−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−17,−16,…,17}|+1 = 36 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(12865, 16385, F128, 33) (dual of [16385, 16320, 34]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 1284−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(1281, 5, F128, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1281, s, F128, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,17]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(12870, 16390, F128, 35) (dual of [16390, 16320, 36]-code), using
- OOA 17-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(12870, 16389, F128, 35) (dual of [16389, 16319, 36]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(12870, 964, F128, 35, 35) (dual of [(964, 35), 33670, 36]-NRT-code), using
- 1282 times duplication [i] based on digital (35, 70, 964)-net over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (37, 72, 964)-net over F128, using
(51, 51+35, 7973)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (51, 86, 7973)-net over F64, using
(51, 51+35, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 86, large)-net in base 64, because
- 33 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 53, large)-net in base 64, but